Download PDF version

A London property management company has been fined in excess of £80,000 for serious fire safety deficiencies in an Islington block of flats.

London Fire Brigade inspectors made two visits to the five-story building on Danbury Street in Islington, which consists of more than 40 self-contained flats. The building is managed by Eurolets (UK) Limited.

Fire Safety Order breaches

The inspectors found severe breaches of the Fire Safety Order, including a lack of fire extinguishers, a non-functioning fire alarm, combustible material in shared spaces, and holes in the walls.

An Enforcement Notice was issued to Eurolets in 2016 following the outcome of a visit by the LFB, which was then sufficiently adhered to. However, at the visits recently, the inspectors found similar defects to the previous inspection.

offenses

Heard at Westminster Magistrates’ Court, Eurolets was charged with the following ten offenses under the Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order, and they entered guilty pleas for each:

  • failure to take general fire precautions.
  • failure to have a suitable and sufficient fire risk assessment.
  • failure to ensure appropriate fire arrangements.
  • failure to ensure exit routes were clear and unlocked.
  • failure to ensure appropriate fire safety measures are in place and conveyed to employees and residents.
  • failure to maintain and ensure fire safety equipment.
  • failure to provide employees with sufficient fire safety information.
  • failure to provide adequate safety training.
  • failure to ensure adequate structural compartmentation.
  • a further charge in respect of combustible items in the second inspection.

They were also ordered to pay a fine of £60,000, a victim surcharge of £170, and costs of £20,000.

Risk of uncontrollable fire spread

The combined effect of the deficiencies was that if a fire had started, there was a risk of an uncontrolled spread"

Paul Jennings, the Assistant Commissioner for Fire Safety, said, “The combined effect of the deficiencies was that if a fire had started, there was a risk of an uncontrolled spread of heat, and smoke and flames affecting the whole premises, coupled with the only means of escape being overcome with smoke."

He adds, “We are pleased with the outcome of this case, which is thanks to the hard work which is done every day by our fire safety inspectors."

responsibility for safety

Paul Jennings continues, "It should also serve as a warning to property managers that we will take action where people are not taking their responsibilities seriously."

He adds, “There’s no excuse for leaving people’s safety to chance, especially when information is so readily available to those with responsibility for safety in buildings to understand what their duties are and ensure they comply with the law.

Download PDF version Download PDF version

In case you missed it

Siemens Expands Into Fire Safety With Danfoss Buy
Siemens Expands Into Fire Safety With Danfoss Buy

Siemens Smart Infrastructure has agreed to acquire Danfoss Fire Safety, which specializes in fire suppression technology and is a subsidiary of Denmark-based Danfoss Group. The ac...

The Dingell Act's Impact: Practical Benefits For Fire Professionals
The Dingell Act's Impact: Practical Benefits For Fire Professionals

The Dingell Act, signed into law in 2019, has far-reaching implications, including effects on fire management and emergency services. Officially named the John D. Dingell, Jr. Cons...

Prevent Downtime With Teledyne FLIR Thermal Imaging
Prevent Downtime With Teledyne FLIR Thermal Imaging

When production halts unexpectedly, it disrupts the entire supply chain, causing delays in product delivery and potential loss of customer trust. Financially, the costs can be sub...

vfd